SOAP and its performance ...
[1/2] from: petr::krenzelok::trz::cz at: 18-Feb-2002 19:08
Hi, There was some discussion ongoing on one Czech server, regarding Ms.NET. Ppl talked SOAP there, and many of them were negative about XML based communication at all. One person told us, that they tried to use SOAP for their solution and ended up in 1000% more complex solution ... http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/DevelopMentor-SOAP/825909 Latency Performance of SOAP Implementations - http://www.caip.rutgers.edu/TASSL/Papers/p2p-p2pws02-soap.pdf Soap + Apache - http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-tp/200104/msg00098.html Maarten, what do you think - how would Rugby compare? :-) -pekr-
[2/2] from: koopmans:itr:ing:nl at: 19-Feb-2002 9:44
> There was some discussion ongoing on one Czech server, regarding Ms.NET. > Ppl talked SOAP there, and many of them were negative about XML based
<<quoted lines omitted: 6>>> http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-tp/200104/msg00098.html > Maarten, what do you think - how would Rugby compare? :-)
Rugby is definitely in the CORBA / RMI range performance wise. Depending on your hardware of course ;-) I think that you get fully secure Rugby for a better performance than SOAP. So for those wondering if Rugby is useful in the enterprise..... draw your own conclusions. --Maarten
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted