Mailing list home
  Find posts   Help

Latest messageRecent messages

Other threads:
 Prev: Rebol/View 1.3 Crash
 Next: timeout error checking

 Random thread

Indexes:
 By topic
 By date
 By author
 By subject
Join the Mailing List....
AccessibilityAbout / FAQ
Member's loungeContact/FeedbackOther REBOL links
Membership:
member name

password

Remember?

Not a member? Please join
22-Sep 19:26 UTC
[0.051] 7.696k
Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

Draw - Bug in Line-Pattern ?

 [1/3] from: pwawood::gmail::com at: 13-Mar-2007 18:36


The documentation of line-pattern in Draw, http://www.rebol.com/docs/draw-ref.html#section-3.19, indicates that an unlimited number of pairs of numbers can be specified to draw complex patterns. The is even the following example: pen blue red line-pattern 7 2 4 4 3 6 However I have found that only the first four parameters seem to be reflected in the line, any others being ignored. Has anybody else experienced this? Regards Peter

 [2/3] from: moliad:aei:ca at: 13-Mar-2007 10:51


Hi Peter, its even worse than that... if you use more than two... it will become quite unstable and assuredly crash... I have RAMBOed it a long time ago, even submitting a snippet which invariably crashed REBOL 1.3.2 maybe its fixed in 2.7, I have not checked, but recent draw useage indicates its still pretty hard-core. also , note that only the first 'PEN color parameter can be none... so can't select to toggle and animate the dots in your line pattern. ' :- / I can't access rebol.net (the server seeems down... still) thus rambo is not available either so I can't give you the ticket number. -MAx Peter Wood wrote:

 [3/3] from: pwawood:gm:ail at: 15-Mar-2007 11:41


Hi MAx The RAMBO ticket number is #4149 and the priority is set to High. Personally, I feel that any bug that crashes the interpreter should be treated as critical....I'm a follower of the no broken windows philosophy. Regards Peter On Tuesday, March 13, 2007, at 11:51 pm, Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote: