XML DOM parser for REBOL?
[1/5] from: premshree::pillai::gmail::com at: 4-Jan-2005 4:17
Hi, all,
Is there a DOM-based XML parser available for REBOL?
--
Premshree Pillai
http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree
[2/5] from: SunandaDH::aol::com at: 3-Jan-2005 19:14
Premshree:
> Is there a DOM-based XML parser available for REBO
This might be the closest:
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=quickparser.r
Sunanda.
[3/5] from: premshree::pillai::gmail::com at: 4-Jan-2005 21:47
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:14:59 EST, [SunandaDH--aol--com] <[SunandaDH--aol--com]> wrote:
> Premshree:
> > Is there a DOM-based XML parser available for REBO
>
> This might be the closest:
>
> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=quickparser.r
Thanks! Will give it a try.
> Sunanda.
> --
> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request
> at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
--
Premshree Pillai
http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree
[4/5] from: inetw3:mindspring at: 5-Jan-2005 23:35
----- Original Message -----
From: "Premshree Pillai" <premshree.pillai-gmail.com>
To: <rebolist-rebol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: XML DOM parser for REBOL?
Hi Premshree, Sunanda,
I'm interested in knowing what you would be using a DOM-based XML
parser with Rebol for.
I really can't see why xml would be necessary, when Rebol parsing
and block/series scripting is an easier data transfer scheme (if Rebol
was used as a networked messaging language at large.)
But... XML/HTML is the simplest way to quickly describe and receive/share
data with the rest of the NET within the browser world. If Rebol thinks it can
replace e-mail and HTML, then it's got to get rid of the E-Mailer and the browser.
I really don't see that ever happening.
I would like to know how some would use a DOM parser with Rebol and XML.
I personally hope to use it to get rid of any xml having to be piped over the web
to be interpreted by the browser. I Can,t share this right now, but Rebol script
would be large and in charge by everyone that does this.
Why i believe we need a quick-parser, a browser plug-in and a DOM-based
XML parser ?
So we can completely control any browser, its contents, HTML,
CSS, password protection, encryption, serializing, ziping, objects, and its'
transfer protocal so people won't have to buy and learn how to use a boat
load of software.
So Rebol would be seen as a reasonable choice to message
web-site data across the net.
I call it, WMD... WYSIWYG Messaged Data
[5/5] from: premshree:pillai::gmail at: 6-Jan-2005 19:26
Okay, so I have not been getting some mails to my inbox, even though
they are getting listed at http://mail.rebol.net/cgi-bin/mail-list.r
Anyway...
inetw3-mindspring.com wrote:
>Hi Premshree, Sunanda,
>
>I'm interested in knowing what you would be using a DOM-based XML
>parser with Rebol for.
>
>I really can't see why xml would be necessary, when Rebol parsing
>and block/series scripting is an easier data transfer scheme (if Rebol
>was used as a networked messaging language at large.)
Yes, parsing REBOL block data is much simpler, but... what do I do if
I want to communicate with a _different_ system? If these were two
REBOL systems that I was dealing with, things would have been
different. But the REBOL block data format is _not_ a standard; XML
is.
>But... XML/HTML is the simplest way to quickly describe and receive/share
>data with the rest of the NET within the browser world. If Rebol thinks it can
Exactly.
>replace e-mail and HTML, then it's got to get rid of the E-Mailer and
the browser.
>I really don't see that ever happening.
>I would like to know how some would use a DOM parser with Rebol and XML.
Well I don't think I understand your question correctly. Anyway, if
you're specifically referring to _DOM_ (as opposed to SAX), it's just
a matter of preference.
>I personally hope to use it to get rid of any xml having to be piped
over the web
>to be interpreted by the browser. I Can,t share this right now, but
Rebol script
>would be large and in charge by everyone that does this.
>Why i believe we need a quick-parser, a browser plug-in and a DOM-based
<<quoted lines omitted: 9>>
>To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request
>at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:47:01 +0530, Premshree Pillai
<[premshree--pillai--gmail--com]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:14:59 EST, [SunandaDH--aol--com] <[SunandaDH--aol--com]> wrote:
> >
<<quoted lines omitted: 15>>
> Premshree Pillai
> http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree
--
Premshree Pillai
http://www.livejournal.com/~premshree
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted