how to do simple exclusive open (locking mechanism), without using t
[1/3] from: carl:rebol at: 6-Jun-2001 10:12
Not every OS supports it, that's why it's not part of Core.
-Carl
[2/3] from: agem::crosswinds::net at: 6-Jun-2001 18:42
Could a way of locking names instead of files be portable?
How the locks are implemented would be hidden,
but one could say »i want a lock for clean-path %asdf.r«,
and some sort of ipc could be used to secure that?
Not blocking the file, just reporting
»name is locked by another rebol«.
Would be enough for most uses?
-Volker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Am 06.06.01, 18:12:02, schrieb "Carl Sassenrath" <[carl--rebol--com]> zum
Thema [REBOL] Re: how to do simple exclusive open (locking mechanism),
without using tcp server?:
[3/3] from: holger:rebol at: 12-Jun-2001 9:06
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:56:48PM +0200, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I just experimented with 'open and various refinements, but could not
> find any easy way of how to acomplish simple locking mechanism ...
>
> RT - why there is no open/exclusive? Would be very handy. Is there any
> problem with multiplatform issues?
Yes, extremely tricky. It sometimes depends on the particular OS versions
and even the type of installation and filesystems whether locking works.
--
Holger Kruse
[holger--rebol--com]







