Distribution
[1/6] from: james:Temecula-usa at: 10-Oct-2003 21:42
Dear professional developers,
If application is created with the SDK, Can it be commercially
distributed? That is, can that application be sold?
thanks,
James
[2/6] from: greggirwin::mindspring::com at: 10-Oct-2003 16:08
Hi James,
JN> If application is created with the SDK, Can it be commercially
JN> distributed? That is, can that application be sold?
Yes. You should get the full license details from RT, but here's a
pertinent section:
REBOL API Restriction. If you choose to export the REBOL API (function
and objects of REBOL) for users of programs created by REBOL/SDK (in
other words, you allow users of your programs to write and execute
REBOL scripts within your program), you must obtain a separate
commercial distribution license from REBOL Technologies. If your
program does not allow users to access the REBOL API, then no
additional license is required.
-- Gregg
[3/6] from: Steven:White:ci:bloomington:mn:us at: 13-Oct-2003 8:43
JN> If application is created with the SDK, Can it be commercially
JN> distributed? That is, can that application be sold?
Two related questions, if I may:
1 of 2: If a person creates an application that requires only the free
version of REBOL/VIEW, and would like to sell the application, is it OK
to include with the application the free version of REBOL/VIEW itself as
a separate item, just to save the customer the trouble of downloading
and installing it himself?
2 of 2: If a person sees something in the script library that sparks
an idea, and develops an application based on it, would it be illegal
and/or tasteless to sell that application when some of the key work was
done by someone else who posted it to the script library?
Not that I have done or am doing any or these things, because I have no
time, but some ideas have crossed my mind.
Thank you.
Steven White
City of Bloomington
1800 W Old Shakopee Rd
Bloomington MN 55431-3096
USA
952-563-4882 (voice)
952-563-4672 (fax)
[steven--white--ci--bloomington--mn--us]
[4/6] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 13-Oct-2003 10:08
Hi Steven,
SW> 1 of 2: If a person creates an application that requires only the free
SW> version of REBOL/VIEW, and would like to sell the application, is it OK
SW> to include with the application the free version of REBOL/VIEW itself as
SW> a separate item, just to save the customer the trouble of downloading
SW> and installing it himself?
That's OK AFAIK. Isn't that how GREBOX works? I would ask for an
official answer from RT to make sure you're covered though.
SW> 2 of 2: If a person sees something in the script library that sparks
SW> an idea, and develops an application based on it, would it be illegal
SW> and/or tasteless to sell that application when some of the key work was
SW> done by someone else who posted it to the script library?
The legality would be based on the copyright and/or license assigned
to the entry. If none is given, you're probably safe legally.
Taste is a subjective matter. I would talk to the original author
in any case. Some people are happy to see their stuff used, others are
fine with visible credit, and most probably won't complain about being
compensated in some way. :)
--Gregg
[5/6] from: ingo:2b1 at: 13-Oct-2003 20:53
Hi Steven,
Steven White wrote:
> JN> If application is created with the SDK, Can it be commercially
> JN> distributed? That is, can that application be sold?
<<quoted lines omitted: 4>>
> a separate item, just to save the customer the trouble of downloading
> and installing it himself?
Long, long ago Carl stated that, if you want to distribute the free
Version of /View, that's fine, but you would have to send your script RT
to be included in the library. I'm not sure this info is still valid, though.
> 2 of 2: If a person sees something in the script library that sparks
> an idea, and develops an application based on it, would it be illegal
> and/or tasteless to sell that application when some of the key work was
> done by someone else who posted it to the script library?
The legal aspect would depend on the scripts copyright. And I expect on
the locality of all involved.
Morally I'd say it's best to ask, or tell the other, if he already gave
permission.
Kind regards,
Ingo
[6/6] from: Rebolinth:nodep:dds:nl at: 13-Oct-2003 21:29
Hiya,
Hope this makes it clear, its clear to me.. Yes you can sell and yes you can distribute...
as long as the license is included for view and Core. SDK encap/API is different, you
need a seperate
license when your code feeds on rebol code for input output by 3th party use (the users).
But a
normal encapped file is free for sales....
(Thats how i read it, and if its not oke then Rebol Inc. should make (should have made)
it more
readable)
JN> If application is created with the SDK, Can it be commercially
JN> distributed? That is, can that application be sold?
>1 of 2: If a person creates an application that requires only the free
>2 of 2: If a person sees something in the script library that sparks
SDK -->
REBOL API Restriction. If you choose to export the REBOL API (function and objects of
REBOL)
for users of programs created by REBOL/SDK (in other words, you allow users of your programs
to write and execute REBOL scripts within your program), you must obtain a separate commercial
distribution license from REBOL Technologies. If your program does not allow users to
access the
REBOL API, then no additional license is required.
VIEW -->
You may redistribute the SOFTWARE provided that you include this
entire License AGREEMENT and all copyright and trademark
notices; and agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend
REBOL from and against any claims or lawsuits, including
attorneys' fees, that arise from use, reproduction, or
distribution of the SOFTWARE.
REBOL/core and /view is distributed on Shareware cdroms all over the world
downloadble from "commercial" sites as well.. and they all keep the License included
;-)
(R)egards,
Norman.
--
Conversation/lunch: "How do you Eat your Rebol in the Morning?"
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted