Another bit of layout trivia

One of my stated reasons for trying alternatives to Style B was the desire to break out of non-REBOL constraints (or implications) of source code layout. Here's an example of something one can say in REBOL that makes no sense in any Algol-like language AFAIK. ordck: func [a [integer!] b [integer!] c [integer!]] [ either a <= b either b <= c [["in order" ]][["scrambled"]] either b <= c [["scrambled"]][["reversed" ]] ] as in use [x y z] [ loop 10 [ x: random 9 y: random 9 z: random 9 print [x y z ordck x y z] ] ] 1 7 8 in order 8 3 7 scrambled 3 1 6 scrambled 9 1 5 scrambled 3 9 2 scrambled 7 4 6 scrambled 4 3 6 scrambled 2 6 6 in order 8 7 8 scrambled 9 2 1 reversed To my thinking it's fascinating that one can "distribute" [ ] across EITHER as if it were an operator... -jn- -- ; sub REBOL {}; sub head ($) {@_[0]} REBOL [] # despam: func [e] [replace replace/all e ":" "." "#" "@"] ; sub despam {my ($e) = @_; $e =~ tr/:#/.@/; return "\n$e"} print head reverse despam "moc:xedef#yleen:leoj" ;