Rebol/Command
[1/4] from: cribbsj::oakwood::org at: 14-Sep-2000 13:24
I have a couple of Command questions:
1. How would I run a script that has Core, Command, and View commands in it?
Which version of the interpreter would I run it against? In other words, how
do you install Command without overlaying the View or Core interpreter?
2. Does anyone know if RT will let you pre-pay for Command now, before it is
released? The reason I ask is that I have some money in my budget that will be
going away soon and I would like to use it to buy Command.
I apologize if this list is an inappropriate place for these questions. If
this is so, could someone direct me to the right place?
--
Jamey Cribbs
Sr. Technical Consultant
[2/4] from: tsummerfelt1:home at: 14-Sep-2000 22:37
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:24:11PM -0400, [cribbsj--oakwood--org] wrote:
> 1. How would I run a script that has Core, Command, and View commands in it?
i had the same question...i'm getting a little frustrated with rebol...takes
me an hour to do the simplest thing that isn't net related
> Which version of the interpreter would I run it against? In other words, how
> do you install Command without overlaying the View or Core interpreter?
i have rebol/core as `rebol'
rebol/view is named `rebolv'
and rebol/command is named `rebolc'
doesn't answer the question though :/
--
*----------------------------------------
|
|http://members.home.net/tsummerfelt1
|
|remove myspleen to email
|
*-----------------------
[3/4] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 15-Sep-2000 6:50
[tsummerfelt1--home--com] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:24:11PM -0400, [cribbsj--oakwood--org] wrote:
> > 1. How would I run a script that has Core, Command, and View commands in it?
<<quoted lines omitted: 5>>
> rebol/view is named `rebolv'
> and rebol/command is named `rebolc'
Should we open discussion upon one-and-only rebol.exe and other in form of
components/libraries/modules? :-))) Sooo many times talked here. However - there
seem to be no reason why /View component should not be available to /Command -
after all - it's "just" a component, isn't it? So, - let's assume RT wants it that
way.
Note to Brett - I don't give up. There are just things you can't do anything about
:-)
-pekr-
[4/4] from: mat:eurogamer at: 15-Nov-2000 14:30
Heya,
Is it just me or is it a great shame that the only way you can get
access to /command is by forking out $249?
The lack of /command is what stops Rebol from being as almost as
useful on the PC as Arexx was on the Amiga.
I can't really fault RT's biz model thus far, it just seems a bit of a
shame not to have some sort of option for amateur folks.
I guess this system works though, I have to figure out a way to get my
company to buy it. :)
--
Mat Bettinson - EuroGamer's Gaming Evangelist with a Goatee
http://www.eurogamer.net | http://www.eurogamer-network.com
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted