Fun with 'fun (really, I'm serious)
[1/3] from: tim::johnsons-web::com at: 16-Nov-2002 17:24
Hello Rebols: (and especially to Andrew)
I'm looking through some of Andrew's Value library
and I came upon his 'Fun function, with allows the
user to create a subroutine in which automatically generated variables
are "kept" local. This appears to be a very useful function.
Any pros or cons?
Has any one done any benchmarks on this one?
I think this one is a keeper, though. Why not
add it to the standard rebol distribution/mezzanine?
--
Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
http://www.johnsons-web.com
[2/3] from: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 17-Nov-2002 10:18
Hi Tim,
I didn't test Andrew's version, but you can find my version in
http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/highfun.r
The name of my version is LFUNC and I am using it quite regularly.
If you have got some free time, it might be useful to compare the functions
-L
[3/3] from: tim:johnsons-web at: 17-Nov-2002 8:19
* Ladislav Mecir <[lmecir--mbox--vol--cz]> [021117 00:56]:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I didn't test Andrew's version, but you can find my version in
> http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/highfun.r
>
> The name of my version is LFUNC and I am using it quite regularly.
>
> If you have got some free time, it might be useful to compare the functions
Thank you Ladislav: There's much good stuff there .....
I believe that I might have a method to compare.
Regards
--
Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
http://www.johnsons-web.com