if only Rebol have submitted their tech to the DVB call for technologies!
[1/4] from: david::may10::ntlworld::com at: 10-Feb-2008 1:35
Hello rebolist,
its a shame and assume its now to late, ut it would have been cool if
carl could have submitted rebol for inclusion to the DVB call for for technologies
http://www.ibc.org/cgi-bin/ibc_dailynews_cms.cgi?story_no=24275&issue=5
...
The commercial requirements were included as an annex to the technical module's
formal call for technologies for DVB-T2, which was addressed without restriction to any
company
that felt it had some technology to offer, whether or not that company was a member of
the DVB Project.
A total of 31 proposals from 21 companies were received by the DVB Project Office
by the closing date in June.
The complicated process of assessing these proposals and agreeing on which combination
has the
potential to meet the commercial requirements is now under way - and new inventions are
not excluded.
...
i wonder if its really to late, or perhaps they could submit something
now if they had the balls to try ;)
hell id love to see rebol view in all the DVB*2 specs as a generic part,
after all DVB C2 , S2, T2 and H2 are the preferred EU wide long term
choice so Rebol.Inc could benefit massively if their IP were taken onboard
--
Best regards,
david
[2/4] from: gregg::pointillistic::com at: 9-Feb-2008 23:02
dm> its a shame and assume its now to late, ut it would have been cool
dm> if carl could have submitted rebol for inclusion to the DVB call
dm> for for technologies...
I doubt Carl has many free moments right now.
-- Gregg
[3/4] from: david::may10::ntlworld::com at: 12-Feb-2008 21:34
Hello Gregg,
Sunday, February 10, 2008, 6:02:34 AM, you wrote:
dm>> its a shame and assume its now to late, but it would have been cool
dm>> if carl could have submitted rebol for inclusion to the DVB call
dm>> for for technologies...
> I doubt Carl has many free moments right now.
> -- Gregg
true, its a shame the team couldn't find some time to try,its just one more missed chance
to progress and in a very big way.
--
Best regards,
david mailto:david.may10-ntlworld.com
[4/4] from: moliad::gmail::com at: 12-Feb-2008 23:25
Hi,
altough R2 could have been a candidate, not sure it would have been such a
good solution as-is. speed, and portability issues have been a thorn in
many attempts by Carl and others to migrate REBOL into other targets and
specialized uses.
R3 is built from the ground up to be portable and much easier to adapt to
different HW/OS needs. Its one of the few core reasons R3 had to be done.
like any new technology, it has had to mature and finally, I think, with R3,
REBOL will be able to evolve on its own wings, not just where/when Carl has
time to bolt them on.
people say R3 has been long in comming, yep. that's life. but new
opportunities are always around the corner. Its Possible that REBOL will be
ready when the next round of updates for this and other technologies will be
called for.
my 0.02 cents
-MAx
On Feb 12, 2008 4:34 PM, david may <david.may10-ntlworld.com> wrote: