B*-Tree
[1/7] from: g::santilli::tiscalinet::it at: 2-May-2002 21:41
Hello all,
just released my code.
Sites > Rebol.it > B*-Tree
Sites > R-Forces > Rebol.it > B*-Tree (mirror)
http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/btree.r
http://www.rebolforces.com/~giesse/reb/btree.r (mirror)
I can send it via email too if anyone has problems downloading.
Now waiting for volunteers writing docs. ;-)
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r
[2/7] from: rotenca:telvia:it at: 3-May-2002 17:56
Hi Gabriele,
what is the reason to have duplicate words at object and global level? (about
your export function)
Why not to make them only global if you need that they are global?
---
Ciao
Romano
[3/7] from: rotenca:telvia:it at: 3-May-2002 17:51
Hi Gabriele,
interesting your:
>> [1x1] > [2x2]
== false
It seems that the y is more significant:
>> [3x2] > [2x3]
== false
---
Ciao
Romano
[4/7] from: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 3-May-2002 19:22
Hi Romano,
On Friday, May 03, 2002, 5:56:43 PM, you wrote:
RPT> what is the reason to have duplicate words at object and global level? (about
RPT> your export function)
No particular reason. I just find it being more comfortable, so
that you have the exported words all together and you can easily
see what you are exporting. Also, a change in what you want to
export or not does not need to change the code except for the line
with the call to EXPORT.
RPT> Why not to make them only global if you need that they are global?
I used to do so in the past...
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r
[5/7] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 3-May-2002 12:36
Hi Romano,
<< It seems that the y is more significant: >>
Yes. Only if the Y values match are the X values taken into account.
--Gregg
[6/7] from: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 4-May-2002 11:26
Hi Romano,
On Friday, May 03, 2002, 5:51:06 PM, you wrote:
RPT> interesting your:
>>> [1x1] > [2x2]
RPT> == false
RPT> It seems that the y is more significant:
[...]
I think that is the old comparison function for pairs. It should
give the same results as SORT.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r
[7/7] from: rotenca:telvia:it at: 11-May-2002 14:31
Hi Gabriele
> RPT> It seems that the y is more significant:
> [...]
>
> I think that is the old comparison function for pairs. It should
> give the same results as SORT.
Now i realize that it is the same routine used also by maximum-of.
---
Ciao
Romano