REBOL Language Specification :D
[1/5] from: behrangsa:gmai:l at: 5-Sep-2005 10:51
Hi
Is there a REBOL Language Specification (like Java Language
Specification) available? With all the BNF grammar and other kinds of
information?
Of course as REBOL is not meant to be implemented by different vendors
this may not be so necessary but it would certainly help.
- Behi
--
Behrang Saeedzadeh
http://www.jroller.com/page/behrangsa
[2/5] from: greggirwin::mindspring::com at: 5-Sep-2005 9:51
Hi Behi,
BS> Is there a REBOL Language Specification (like Java Language
BS> Specification) available? With all the BNF grammar and other kinds of
BS> information?
Not at this time.
-- Gregg
[3/5] from: charles:mougel:spinodo at: 5-Sep-2005 17:58
>BS> Is there a REBOL Language Specification (like Java Language
>BS> Specification) available? With all the BNF grammar and other kinds of
>BS> information?
>
>Gregg> Not at this time.
>
This can be a good thing, for those who think that rebol is just a
product
, no ?
Charles.
[4/5] from: greggirwin::mindspring::com at: 5-Sep-2005 13:03
>>BS> Is there a REBOL Language Specification (like Java Language
>>BS> Specification) available? With all the BNF grammar and other kinds of
>>BS> information?
>>
>>Gregg> Not at this time.
>>
SCM> This can be a good thing, for those who think that rebol is just a
SCM> "product", no ?
Yes, but I don't think it's on RT's list of pending docs at this
point. Due to REBOL's design, based on denotational semantics, I'm not
sure how many people could make use of it anyway.
-- Gregg
[5/5] from: andreas::bolka::gmx::net at: 5-Sep-2005 21:47
Monday, September 5, 2005, 9:03:17 PM, Gregg wrote:
> Due to REBOL's design, based on denotational semantics, I'm not sure
> how many people could make use of it anyway.
Are you sure that this is still true for any significant part of
post-1.0 REBOL? I, for one, would be _very_ interested in a DS for
REBOL :)
--
Best regards,
Andreas