Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

annoying public dir

 [1/7] from: rebol-list2:seznam:cz at: 12-Aug-2004 23:26


Hello rebolist, hi, is it just me who don't like that everywhere I run rebol script, new public directory is created:( I think, that if it's possible only one directory should be used as in older versions - reason: I have a lot of files in the main public dir cache which are not available if I run script from different location:( -- Best regards, rebOldes -----------------[ http://oldes.multimedia.cz/ ]

 [2/7] from: gabriele:colellachiara at: 13-Aug-2004 18:21


Hi rebOldes, On Thursday, August 12, 2004, 11:26:53 PM, you wrote: r> hi, is it just me who don't like that everywhere I run rebol script, r> new public directory is created:( That should probably be fixed in the next version. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --- SOON: http://www.rebol.it/

 [3/7] from: moliad:aei:ca at: 14-Aug-2004 0:42


rebOldes wrote:
> Hello rebolist, > hi, is it just me who don't like that everywhere I run rebol script,
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> dir cache which are not available if I run script from different > location:(
I sometimes wish rebol/view did not include the desktop. And there was a different product, rebol/desktop, which was equal to current /view version. I don't want to have to install rebol/view for it to work properly and I don't need the desktop when using rebol 99% of the time. -MAx

 [4/7] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 14-Aug-2004 10:55


Hi Maxim, MOA> I sometimes wish rebol/view did not include the desktop. And MOA> there was a different product, rebol/desktop, which was equal to MOA> current /view version. That would be REBOL/Face (in the SDK). You can build View from it with a few includes; no desktop. -- Gregg

 [5/7] from: moliad:aei:ca at: 14-Aug-2004 13:36


Gregg Irwin wrote:
> Hi Maxim, > > MOA> I sometimes wish rebol/view did not include the desktop. And > MOA> there was a different product, rebol/desktop, which was equal to > MOA> current /view version. > > That would be REBOL/Face (in the SDK). You can build View from it with > a few includes; no desktop.
yeah, but sdk isn't free and its meant to be encapped. AFAIK, You can't share it unencapped as an interpreter... I would love to have a minimal face or view rebol interpreter. If I want to replace VID, why should I want a version which includes it, for example... yet I don't want my stuff encapped... -MAx

 [6/7] from: gchiu:compkarori at: 15-Aug-2004 9:38


Gregg Irwin wrote.. apparently on 14-Aug-2004/10:55:56-6:00
>Hi Maxim, > >MOA> I sometimes wish rebol/view did not include the desktop. And >MOA> there was a different product, rebol/desktop, which was equal to >MOA> current /view version. > >That would be REBOL/Face (in the SDK). You can build View from it with >a few includes; no desktop. >
Even if you do this, be aware that using 'request-download also creates a public directory to store the file. -- Graham Chiu http://www.compkarori.com/cerebrus http://www.compkarori.com/rebolml

 [7/7] from: rebol-list2:seznam:cz at: 17-Aug-2004 22:47


Hello Maxim, Saturday, August 14, 2004, 7:36:58 PM, you wrote: MOA> yet I don't want my stuff encapped... I agree with you, I like Rebol because I can see the code if I want. I'm usually not running any .exe files if not necessary. Oldes

Notes
  • Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
    View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted