Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

Some Morpheus news ...

 [1/6] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 14-Mar-2002 19:08


Hi, some Morpheus related news .... http://news.com.com/2100-1023-859678.html?tag=cd_mh http://www.slyck.com/news/031402b.html 1. week of April we should finally know, if new Morpheus is or is not Rebol powered .... -pekr-

 [2/6] from: ralph::abooks::com at: 14-Mar-2002 13:49


>Hi, >some Morpheus related news ....
<<quoted lines omitted: 4>>
>-pekr- >--
Interesting, Pekr... Hmmm, I trust the "mysteriously defunct previous version" they mention was not REBOL-based? --Ralph

 [3/6] from: carl:cybercraft at: 15-Mar-2002 19:28


On 15-Mar-02, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> Hi, > some Morpheus related news .... > http://news.com.com/2100-1023-859678.html?tag=cd_mh > http://www.slyck.com/news/031402b.html > 1. week of April we should finally know, if new Morpheus is or is > not Rebol powered ....
Another report here... http://money.cnn.com/2002/03/13/news/companies/musiccity/index.htm Previously, the site only housed the software that enabled users to share files. The new site will still run on the same technology, but users will be directed to a separate site, Morpheusos.com, to gain access to the software. same technology ? "MorpheusOS"? Well, their download page is at... http://www.morpheus-os.com/ How long has it had the "OS" in its URL? That certainly gives it a REBOL flavor. There's discussion in that article about whether their business model will work. "But it's a model that's been proven difficult to generate revenue. It's a tough thing because the vast majority of users go to download popular music -- they are going to find a limited audience." I doubt it'll work too, as people don't like being asked for money every ten minutes. Basic human nature. A better idea would be subscribing to such a network where the subscribers have unrestricted access to everything and with the content providers receiving their cut of those subscriptions based on how popular their content is. Need a lot of stuff there to make people believe it was worth subscribing to in the first place though. -- Carl Read

 [4/6] from: chalz:earthlink at: 18-Mar-2002 1:21


> "same technology"? "MorpheusOS"? Well, their download page is at... > > http://www.morpheus-os.com/ > > How long has it had the "OS" in its URL? That certainly gives it a > REBOL flavor.
My question is, how in the world does it qualify as an "OS"?
> A better idea would be subscribing to such a network where the > subscribers have unrestricted access to everything and with the > content providers receiving their cut of those subscriptions based on > how popular their content is. Need a lot of stuff there to make > people believe it was worth subscribing to in the first place though.
Absolutely agreed. But then you end up with "channel packages", like in cable TV, whereby a few "good" channels are grouped with a selection of crappy ones no one wants, simply so they'll be included. Heaven forbid the popular ones get money while the unpopular ones die. Oh well. --Charles

 [5/6] from: carl:cybercraft at: 18-Mar-2002 21:28


On 18-Mar-02, Charles wrote:
>> "same technology"? "MorpheusOS"? Well, their download page is at... >> http://www.morpheus-os.com/ >> How long has it had the "OS" in its URL? That certainly gives it a >> REBOL flavor. > My question is, how in the world does it qualify as an "OS"?
In the same way REBOL IOS does, is one way. I agree it's a confusing term when applied to just a file-sharing program though. -- Carl Read

 [6/6] from: chris:starforge:demon at: 18-Mar-2002 15:03


Charles wrote:
>>How long has it had the "OS" in its URL? That certainly gives it a >>REBOL flavor. >> > My question is, how in the world does it qualify as an "OS"?
One word: Marketing ;)
> Absolutely agreed. But then you end up with "channel packages", like in > cable TV, whereby a few "good" channels are grouped with a selection of crappy > ones no one wants, simply so they'll be included. Heaven forbid the popular > ones get money while the unpopular ones die. Oh well.
Define popular. On second thoughts, don't. We've already gone down that road with the argument about web browsers haven't we ;) Chris -- .------{ http://www.starforge.co.uk }-----. .--------------------------. =[ Explorer2260, Designer and Coder \=\ P: TexMaker, ROACH, site \ =[___You_will_obey_your_corporate_masters___]==[ Stack: EETmTmTRRSS------ ]

Notes
  • Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
    View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted