Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

Array access and paths

 [1/3] from: dankelg8::cs::man::ac::uk at: 18-May-2001 15:21


On Tue, 15 May 2001, Joel Neely wrote:
> ... (And, of course, I'll be the first to cheer if REBOL 3.0 > turns out to be wonderful for array-based numerical computation. > However, it will take changes BOTH in performance AND notation > before that happy state arrives.)
I think this is the single most annoying thing about REBOL. Dealing with matrices etc is a nightmare!! I think there are a few problems with paths. At first, they look like a replacement for array indexing in other languages, but the fact that they only support a limited way of getting values is a big annoyance. Here is an example: list: [A 0 B 5 C 0 D 0] Say I want to change the number 5 following the B to 6. It's easy to read this number:
>> list/B
== 5 Or more generally:
>> idx: 'B
== B
>> list/:idx
== 5 So far it looks very good. But then, try changing this value!
>> change at list 'B 6
does not work.
>> change next find list 'B 6
Not very nice. Another example: I want to get a function from an array:
>> func-array: reduce [a: func [x][]]
== [func [x][]]
>> f: :func-array/1
** Script Error: 1 is missing its x argument ** Near: f: :func-array/1 Gisle

 [2/3] from: cyphre:volny:cz at: 18-May-2001 17:00


> I think this is the single most annoying thing about REBOL. > Dealing with matrices etc is a nightmare!! >
I don't think so. Have a look at REBOLek's rebsite %matrix.r script... realy nice and fast vector graphics example using matrices!
> Here is an example: > list: [A 0 B 5 C 0 D 0]
<<quoted lines omitted: 11>>
> >> change at list 'B 6 > does not work.
'at needs as a second parameter index not word... you can try this: change at list index? next find list 'b 6 or poke list index? next find list 'b 6 but I'd prefer your solution above...
> >> change next find list 'B 6 > Not very nice.
<<quoted lines omitted: 5>>
> ** Script Error: 1 is missing its x argument > ** Near: f: :func-array/1
try: probe pick :func-array 1 or probe first :func-array have fun, Cyphre

 [3/3] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 18-May-2001 12:44


Hi, Gisle, Gisle Dankel wrote:
> I think there are a few problems with paths... > > Here is an example: > > list: [A 0 B 5 C 0 D 0] >
...
> >> idx: 'B > == B > >> list/:idx > == 5 >
Another land mine not to step on if you take that last approach is this: the type of the value in IDX actually makes a difference in what the / means. If, as in your example, IDX is set to a word, then list/:idx is (almost) equivalent to select list idx but if IDX is set to an integer, then list/:idx is equivalent to pick list idx instead. (This also means that using integers as "symbolic keys" is problematic -- a pain in the neck.) I said "(almost) equivalent" above because of this situation
>> idx: 'E
== E
>> list/:idx
** Script Error: Invalid path value: E ** Where: halt-view ** Near: list/:idx
>> select list idx
== none in which throwing an error and returning NONE are *not* IMHO equivalent behavior. -jn-

Notes
  • Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
    View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted