ODBC 'rows non functional?
[1/3] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 4-Feb-2003 16:36
Hello, today I got myself back to some ODBC work and am wondering - even when I set 'rows item to let's say 1000, following command returns 3070 items long block. Maybe I just don't understand it correctly, but I thought that 'rows item will limit copy to 1000 records? Or is it just rebol internal thing? I can bypass it by using copy/part when reading, but ... just wondering Thanks, -pekr-
[2/3] from: vincenke::ohsu::edu at: 4-Feb-2003 17:26
Did you send "set rowcount 1000"?
[3/3] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 5-Feb-2003 9:12
Ken Vincent wrote:
>Did you send "set rowcount 1000"? >
send to DB? I don't know if my ODBC driver supports it, but I acted according to docs, which state that we should use port/locals/rows, so I did so, but no luck here ... -pekr-