Rebol Bug-List
[1/12] from: al:bri:xtra at: 13-Oct-2000 4:09
Hi, Ladislav.
I'm replying through the Rebol list, because my ISP says:
<Quote>
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the return address was refused.
The return address was '<[Al--Bri--xtra--co--nz]>'
</Quote>
It seems your email service doesn't like me. :-(
You wrote (directly to me):
> How about the bug list organization - all bugs in one file, or a file for
every bug?
One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
one file to link them all! :-)
Apart from sounding like a line from Tolkien, it's a reasonable plan I
believe.
Suggestions
Directories like this:
/Core
/View
/Apache
/Command
Each of the above having:
/New - This is for new bugs.
/Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
/Fixed - For fixed bugs.
[Your suggestions here.]
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
[2/12] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 13-Oct-2000 13:17
[Al--Bri--xtra--co--nz] wrote:
> Hi, Ladislav.
> I'm replying through the Rebol list, because my ISP says:
<<quoted lines omitted: 21>>
> /Fixing - Bugs being fixed (hopefully).
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
Seem to be fine strategy, as it comply with your
component/plug-in/enhancement/patch system. Btw: any progress here? :-)
-pekr-
> [Your suggestions here.]
>
you should buy me a beer ;-)
[3/12] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 13-Oct-2000 6:55
[Al--Bri--xtra--co--nz] wrote:
> One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
> one file to link them all! :-)
<<quoted lines omitted: 11>>
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
> [Your suggestions here.]
Does the /New /Fixing /Fixed trichotomy imply that a bug report
would migrate between directories as its status changes? This
would imply that I couldn't, for example, bookmark a bug report
and return periodically (or via a REBOL 'bot ;-) to check for
changes in status.
Would it be simpler to have a "status" datum for each report,
and have a variety of list/link files to categorize them in
various useful ways (platform, status, who reported, version
in which it appeared, version in which it was exterminated...)?
-jn-
[4/12] from: al:bri:xtra at: 13-Oct-2000 5:09
pekr wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Each of the above having:
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> >
> Seem to be fine strategy, as it comply with your
component/plug-in/enhancement/patch system.
> Btw: any progress here? :-)
Still working on system. I've realised I need a simpler system to store them
to my site, and to retrieve them from other locations.
> > [Your suggestions here.]
> you should buy me a beer ;-)
=======================================
| This voucher permits the bearer: |
| one (1) beer |
| at any virtual bar on the internet. |
| Signed: Andrew Martin. |
=======================================
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://members.nbci.com/AndrewMartin/
[5/12] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 13-Oct-2000 14:15
[Al--Bri--xtra--co--nz] wrote:
> pekr wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
<<quoted lines omitted: 9>>
> Still working on system. I've realised I need a simpler system to store them
> to my site, and to retrieve them from other locations.
What's the problem with storage? /components/component-name.r's header contains
'home or 'file, the fields to store the storage, e.g.
www.somesite.com/rebol/components/component-name.r. Or are you talking about
anything else?
> > > [Your suggestions here.]
> > you should buy me a beer ;-)
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> | Signed: Andrew Martin. |
> >
:-))) Well, thanks, I will enjoy it. Anyone to join me? :-)
[6/12] from: sharriff:aina:med-iq at: 13-Oct-2000 13:49
Hi Guys!
I´ve seen The word "does" a few times with objects. Can somone tell me
where to look up info on it? its not in the core dictionary or users guide.
Sharriff Aina
med.iq information & quality in healthcare AG
[7/12] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 13-Oct-2000 15:11
[Sharriff--Aina--med-iq--de] wrote:
> Hi Guys!
>
> I´ve seen The word "does" a few times with objects. Can somone tell me
> where to look up info on it? its not in the core dictionary or users guide.
>
->> source does
does: func [
{Defines a function that has no arguments or locals.}
[catch]
body [block!] "The body block of the function"
][
throw-on-error [make function! [] body]
]
->>
[8/12] from: lmecir:geocities at: 13-Oct-2000 15:41
Hi,
I don't understand, why your mail didn't get through (I received your
previous mail normally).
> Hi, Ladislav.
> I'm replying through the Rebol list, because my ISP says:
<<quoted lines omitted: 6>>
> You wrote (directly to me):
> > How about the bug list organization - all bugs in one file, or a file
for
> every bug?
> One bug = one file. One file to list them, one file to describe them, and
<<quoted lines omitted: 12>>
> /Fixed - For fixed bugs.
> [Your suggestions here.]
How about /Patched?
[9/12] from: sharriff:aina:med-iq at: 13-Oct-2000 14:42
Is´nt this the same as defining an unamed function without arguments?
Sharriff Aina
med.iq information & quality in healthcare AG
Gutenbergstr. 42
41564 Kaarst
tel.: 02131-3669-0
fax: 02131-3669-599
www.med-iq.de
Petr.Krenzelo
[k--trz--cz] An: [list--rebol--com]
Kopie:
13.10.00 Thema: [REBOL] Antwort: Rebol Bug-List Re:(3)
14:11
Bitte
antworten an
list
[Sharriff--Aina--med-iq--de] wrote:
> Hi Guys!
>
> I´ve seen The word "does" a few times with objects. Can somone tell me
> where to look up info on it? its not in the core dictionary or users
guide.
->> source does
does: func [
{Defines a function that has no arguments or locals.}
[catch]
body [block!] "The body block of the function"
][
throw-on-error [make function! [] body]
]
->>
[10/12] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 13-Oct-2000 11:58
Hello, Sharriff,
>> ? does
USAGE:
DOES body
DESCRIPTION:
Defines a function that has no arguments or locals.
DOES is a function value.
ARGUMENTS:
body -- The body block of the function (Type: block)
(SPECIAL ATTRIBUTES)
catch
>> greet: does [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
>> greet
Hi, Sharriff
>>
[Sharriff--Aina--med-iq--de] wrote:
> Hi Guys!
>
> I´ve seen The word "does" a few times with objects. Can somone tell me
> where to look up info on it? its not in the core dictionary or users guide.
>
> Sharriff Aina
> med.iq information & quality in healthcare AG
--
; Joel Neely [joel--neely--fedex--com] 901-263-4460 38017/HKA/9677
REBOL [] do [ do func [s] [ foreach [a b] s [prin b] ] sort/skip
do function [s] [t] [ t: "" foreach [a b] s [repend t [b a]] t ] {
| e s m!zauafBpcvekexEohthjJakwLrngohOqrlryRnsctdtiub} 2 ]
[11/12] from: joel:neely:fedex at: 13-Oct-2000 12:10
Hi, Sharriff,
[Sharriff--Aina--med-iq--de] wrote:
> Is´nt this the same as defining an unamed function without arguments?
> Sharriff Aina
<<quoted lines omitted: 4>>
> fax: 02131-3669-599
> www.med-iq.de
Yes.
>> source does
does: func [
{Defines a function that has no arguments or locals.} [catch]
body [block!] "The body block of the function"
][
throw-on-error [make function! [] body]
]
The same effect can be obtained a couple of ways.
>> greet: does [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
>> greet
Hi, Sharriff
>> greet: to-paren [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
== (print "Hi, Sharriff")
>> greet
Hi, Sharriff
>> greet: func [] [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
>> greet
Hi, Sharriff
>> greeting: [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
== [print "Hi, Sharriff"]
>> do greeting
Hi, Sharriff
It would be interesting to see what tradeoffs exist among these
various approaches. YMMV.
-jn-
--
; Joel Neely [joel--neely--fedex--com] 901-263-4460 38017/HKA/9677
REBOL [] do [ do func [s] [ foreach [a b] s [prin b] ] sort/skip
do function [s] [t] [ t: "" foreach [a b] s [repend t [b a]] t ] {
| e s m!zauafBpcvekexEohthjJakwLrngohOqrlryRnsctdtiub} 2 ]
[12/12] from: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 14-Oct-2000 15:48
Hello [joel--neely--fedex--com]!
On 13-Ott-00, you wrote:
j> Does the /New /Fixing /Fixed trichotomy imply that a bug
j> report would migrate between directories as its status
j> changes? This would imply that I couldn't, for example,
j> bookmark a bug report and return periodically (or via a REBOL
j> 'bot ;-) to check for changes in status.
Moving the files across directories is not a good idea IMHO.
j> Would it be simpler to have a "status" datum for each report,
j> and have a variety of list/link files to categorize them in
j> various useful ways (platform, status, who reported, version
j> in which it appeared, version in which it was
j> exterminated...)?
I think so, too.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[giesse--writeme--com]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted