Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

COMPILER

 [1/15] from: john::thousand-hills::net at: 26-Aug-2001 12:56


Does REBOL have a compiler? ..John

 [2/15] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 26-Aug-2001 22:40


Hi, although Carl once joked around - "why don't you folks use 'compile", there is no compiler available for Rebol, and due its architecture, there is probably not going to be any compiler either ... Sad but true (c) Metallica :-) -pekr-

 [3/15] from: john:thousand-hills at: 26-Aug-2001 20:03


It would be nice to ba able to protect ones income.. John At 10:40 PM 8/26/2001 +0200, you wrote:

 [4/15] from: hallvard:ystad:helpinhand at: 27-Aug-2001 8:39


There is Command/Runtime, but it's buggy, and doesn't really compile, it simply wraps your code in an executable (after encrypting it). I would be using it, if only it could receive my input parameters properly... ~H Du skrev (03.03 27.08.2001):

 [5/15] from: john:thousand-hills at: 27-Aug-2001 5:53


Where can I GET A COPY OF IT? John At 08:39 AM 8/27/2001 +0200, you wrote:

 [6/15] from: belymt:saunalahti:fi at: 27-Aug-2001 14:01


At 05:53 27.8.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Where can I GET A COPY OF IT?
I assume it's either available as a download from Rebol site or you have to buy it directly from Rebol... Joanna

 [7/15] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 27-Aug-2001 12:55


Joanna Kurki wrote:
> At 05:53 27.8.2001 -0500, you wrote: > >Where can I GET A COPY OF IT? > > I assume it's either available as a download from Rebol site or you have to > buy it directly from Rebol...
Last I heard it is not available for last rebol product releases. If it would be available, it would be well advertised on RT's website ... But - topic is wrong - don't call compiler what most ppl don't regard being compiler - it's just runtime. Most of us, though, would love to see REAL Rebol compiler, speeding-up some code execution :-) Cheers, -pekr-

 [8/15] from: holger:rebol at: 27-Aug-2001 10:19


On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 08:39:13AM +0200, Hallvard Ystad wrote:
> There is Command/Runtime, but it's buggy, and doesn't really compile, it simply wraps your code in an executable (after encrypting it). I would be using it, if only it could receive my input parameters properly...
The new Command/Encap has all known bugs fixed and handles input parameters correctly. It also allows you to set security parameters, network setting and a few other things. If you are interested please contact [cindy--rebol--com] for licensing information. We will make official announcements soon. -- Holger Kruse [holger--rebol--com]

 [9/15] from: ammoncooke:yaho:o at: 27-Aug-2001 11:32


but that doesn't do /View does it? Thanks!! Ammon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Holger Kruse" <[holger--rebol--com]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:19 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: COMPILER
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 08:39:13AM +0200, Hallvard Ystad wrote: > > There is Command/Runtime, but it's buggy, and doesn't really compile, it
simply wraps your code in an executable (after encrypting it). I would be using it, if only it could receive my input parameters properly...

 [10/15] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 27-Aug-2001 19:48


----- Original Message ----- From: "Holger Kruse" <[holger--rebol--com]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:19 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: COMPILER
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 08:39:13AM +0200, Hallvard Ystad wrote: > > There is Command/Runtime, but it's buggy, and doesn't really compile, it
simply wraps your code in an executable (after encrypting it). I would be using it, if only it could receive my input parameters properly...
> The new Command/Encap has all known bugs fixed and handles input
parameters correctly. It
> also allows you to set security parameters, network setting and a few
other things.
> If you are interested please contact [cindy--rebol--com] for licensing
information. We will
> make official announcements soon.
Holger, you man - :-) what is "soon" in Ukiah terms? Is your "soon" soon enough? :-) -pekr-

 [11/15] from: hallvard:ystad:helpinhand at: 28-Aug-2001 8:59


This is good news! I sent an e-mail to [cindy--rebol] some time ago, but I guess it's lost somewhere on the way, because I never got any reply. Will this new release include /view? And (especially in that case) will licencing be much more expensive than for version 1.0? ~H Du skrev (19.19 27.08.2001):

 [12/15] from: holger:rebol at: 28-Aug-2001 9:43


On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:59:46AM +0200, Hallvard Ystad wrote:
> This is good news! I sent an e-mail to [cindy--rebol] some time ago, but I guess it's lost somewhere on the way, because I never got any reply. Will this new release include /view? And (especially in that case) will licencing be much more expensive than for version 1.0?
Please contact Cindy again. -- Holger Kruse [holger--rebol--com]

 [13/15] from: holger:rebol at: 28-Aug-2001 9:42


On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:32:33AM -0700, Ammon Cooke wrote:
> but that doesn't do /View does it?
Yes, it does. Command/Encap comes with two binaries, one for regular Command and one for Command/View. -- Holger Kruse [holger--rebol--com]

 [14/15] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 28-Aug-2001 18:54


----- Original Message ----- From: "Holger Kruse" <[holger--rebol--com]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:42 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: COMPILER
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:32:33AM -0700, Ammon Cooke wrote: > > but that doesn't do /View does it? > > Yes, it does. Command/Encap comes with two binaries, one for regular > Command and one for Command/View.
What about /View/Pro then? /Command/View includes /Command features as ODBC, FastCGI. Is there also separate solution for View/Pro users, willing to distribute their sw? Thanks, -pekr-

 [15/15] from: holger:rebol at: 28-Aug-2001 11:14


On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> What about /View/Pro then? /Command/View includes /Command features as ODBC, > FastCGI. Is there also separate solution for View/Pro users, willing to > distribute their sw?
These are licensing issues, because Command/View is a superset of View/Pro. Please contact Cindy regarding licensing, explaining how you want to use Encap. -- Holger Kruse [holger--rebol--com]