Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Annabelle Content Management System

From: tim-johnsons::web::com at: 13-Sep-2007 13:28

On Thursday 13 September 2007, Sabu Francis wrote:
> Hi > Yes Prolog is quite a useful language. The concept of 'backtracking' is > very powerful. In fact, I think (not verified) many important concepts > originated in Prolog and Lisp, two of the oldest languages. It also > handles data and meta-data structures very nicely. > > I had used a variant of XML in Prolog (which I used to call 'proXML') > that overcame many of the problems that Carl had pointed out in XML. > Anyway, I am probably digressing ... > > I find Rebol also a very good language to work with. I think it can also > handle data+code together (data turning into code, code back into data) > which can be very useful. Now if someone has figured out a way to do > backtracking in Rebol and do things like 'findall' ( a predicate in most > Prolog to collect data together)... well that would be really wonderful.
I'm a web programmer and despite then popularity of python (my other scripting tool) and the depend for python scripters, I do more and more in rebol. The change is accelerated by the growth in rebol assets such as those at I'm not sure *exactly* what findall does, but what follows is first - a rebol function that I wrote based on earlier code by Marco ( I think that is the same Marco that wrote prolog.r) - and after that is a simple console session. cheers tim ;; =========== code ===================== every: def[ "Evaluates code following any expression that is not FALSE or NONE." " Accumulates return values of code (if 'set)." " Returns a block if at least one code set is evaluated." " If no code block is evaluated, returns 'false." " Handles unset! values" cases [block!] "Block of cases to evaluate." ][ _n: func ["Check for unset values and return 'none if found" v [any-type!]][either unset? get/any 'v [none][v]] res: false data: copy[] while [not empty? cases][ set [condition cases] do/next cases if condition [ res: true body: first cases if T: _n do body[append data T] ] cases: next cases ] either res[ either empty? data[res][data] ][res] ] ;; NOTES: 1)'def is a subroutine variant that automatically generates ;; local variables ;; 2)Multiple docstrings ;; console session:
>> res: every[1[1] false[2] true[3]]
== [1 3]