[REBOL] Re: The truth about scope
From: volker:nitsch:g:mail at: 14-Apr-2005 18:42
On 4/14/05, Gabriele Santilli <[gabriele--colellachiara--com]> wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 1:12:08 PM, you wrote:
>
> VN> i guess you made a typo and now we have a misunderstanding.
>
> Well, no.
>
> But, that is an implementation detail.
>
> The position in series is kept in the value. So, S and B/1, from
> the point of view of implementation, are two distinct but
> identical values.
Now i get it. The confusing point is then, you put s in a series. that
leads to the conclusion a series in a series is different. but you
mean:
a: []
b: a
c: b
d: reduce[c]
now a, b, c and d/1 reference the same block and the words contain the
same bits, but the bits are on different memory-locations. they "mean"
the same, but they are not the same.
i was using "same" in the meaning-sense. and then skipping sticks with
the series, but is a bit diffent, so different for the 'same? -
function. while an exact copy is same in the 'same? - sense. so i
thought you want to demo that and forgot the assignment. sorry ;)
--
-Volker
Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of
indirection. But that usually will create another problem.
David
Wheeler
