[REBOL] Re: RFC: make-doc-pro feature / glossary
From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 7-Jun-2002 11:31
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [rebol-bounce--rebol--com] [mailto:[rebol-bounce--rebol--com]]On Behalf Of
> Volker Nitsch
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:16 AM
> To: [rebol-list--rebol--com]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: RFC: make-doc-pro feature / glossary
> for glossary: if you mark only for html, that would be visible only there.
Hi, that's just the idea for HTML output. For PDF output it would be possible to
include an implicit chapter "glossary".
> the benefit of make-doc dialect is, it is readble as text too.
That's what it should be :-))
> dialect?: something special nearly the same as the usual.
> text?: you can't use smart hovering..
> html?: text which knows there is a mouse.
> make-doc?: a quick way to write good looking.
>
> for general words there is an include-option.
So is this just the definition of the glossary words or do you want to include
this into normal text? Will all words in the text show the glossary term?
How about:
\glossary
:dialect - something special nearly the same as usual.
=include general_words.r
/glossary
Robert
