Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: View a list of Data including checkbox

From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 1-Apr-2003 15:48

Graham Chiu wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:08:22 -0500 (EST) > Jeannot Chapdelaine <[jchapde--yahoo--ca]> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to have in REBOL a list of data >> with one checkbox per row, where we can check and >> uncheck directly in the list ? > > I'm not aware of such a beast, and I had the same need recently. > > In the end I modified text-list so that clicking without control > allowed multiple selects .. and gave me the same functionality. > > Check out Cerebrus' email manager to see what I mean.
What is the problem with that one? I have it functional here .... first block of list simply accepts sub-VID dialect - it is like panel, which simply encloses another VID styles .... small example, although maybe not easily understandable, as it is mixed with my small util logic ... lst: list 230x350 [ origin 0 space 0x0 across t: text bold black 200x20 [ x: next find vyber-meny t/text either (first x) = "Ano" [change x "Ne"][change x "Ano"] show ch ] ch: check black [] ] supply [ count: count + cnt face/color: ivory face/text: none face/image: none if even? count [face/color: ivory - 50.50.50] p1: pick vyber-meny (count * 2) - 1 p2: pick vyber-meny (count * 2) if none? p1 [exit] ; exit if end of array ... either index = 1 [ face/text: p1 ][ face/data: either p2 = "Ano" [true][false] ] ] Note: as I mentioned in regards to Romano's resize system, styles supporting function code block are real hell for rebol beginner-programmers, because of one simple reason - there are words that you are required to know, if you want to work effectively with the style. 'face is OK here, but 'cnt is a problem .... maybe you will not agree, but 'supply part of list style is a real stopper to style usage, and I have proof with three other ppl I get to some VID coding .... I wonder if there is more intuitive way? -pekr-