Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Scrollpanel style

From: brett:codeconscious at: 28-May-2001 21:49

Thanks for the info Volker. That probe secure query was illuminating. I'm not quite sure yet what I'll do because I'm not happy about changing the organisation of the directories just yet. I'll look at this again because I think you are right that the security prompt should be avoided. Brett. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Volker Nitsch" <[agem--crosswinds--net]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Scrollpanel style General rule of /view-sandbox is AFAIK: read access to public cache, read/write-access to scripts dir and all subdirs beyond. That means you should organize like %reb-starters/ %reb-starters/reb-library/ %reb-starters/reb-images/ ... this way the script in %reb-starters/ starts with write-allow for all sub- dirs. If they call other scripts, that allowness stays, so you can place rebol[] do %demos/the-demo.r there and in a %demos/ script do %../reb-lib/something . You have %somewhere/reb-starters/ and %somewhere/reb-library/ parallel, and rebol thinks: »he goes out of the sandbox!! time to ask!« ;-) personally i like this onionskin-thinking for security, keeps setting-stuff simple. start a script from the Desktop like [rebol[] probe secure query] to check it :) -Volker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Am 27.05.01, 23:25:10, schrieb "Brett Handley" <[brett--codeconscious--com]> zum Thema [REBOL] Re: Scrollpanel style:
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Volker Nitsch" <[agem--crosswinds--net]> > To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 4:17 AM > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Scrollpanel style > Hi Brett > > Library list ii: > > > > I would heavily wish people would put their starter-scripts > > in the root-dir, since makes library/image-dirs > > subdirs and live here much easier. > Do you mean everything I have in
> go in > If so, eek - supports a website as well and who
knows what
> in the future. I figured having one directory called rebol-library
> enable me to store relatively stable scripts away from more volatile
> Also, it doesn't seem to be a problem for which has a
> of directories. > Currently I have > > ...rebol-library/ > ...rebsite/ > ...rebol/ ; <- website html files. > Or maybe it should be > > ...rebol/ > ......rebsite/ > ......library/ > Which I started with and then changed because I wanted to seperate
> from *.r - the html files may have been bookmarked. > > On linux security-questions are written like with /core > > to the console, which i mostly have - hm, somewhere under something > > under.. > > means the program looks hanging with first downloads.. > Oh. Ugly - bit of a show stopper for user applications.
Yes :'-(