[REBOL] Re: Command 2 questions
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 27-May-2001 13:15
----- Original Message -----
From: "Holger Kruse" <[holger--rebol--com]>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Command 2 questions
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:13:48PM +0200, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> > Is there any native support inside rebol binary (similar as encyption
> > scheme), or just is it plain script implementation (similar to
> > one in principle)?
> The implementation is native.
Great. I would like to ask RT to add also PostGress SQL native database
support for Linux version to have it "complete". PostGress, as of 7.1
version is regarded being "free Oracle" or so I heard. It is free, yet
powerfull and properly supports transactions. If you will hear to Apache +
PHP ppl, many of them talk just two SQL databases - mySQL and PostGressSQL.
Anyone here to second my observations?
> > btw: are there any discounts, when buying Command for let's say Win32
> > Linux platforms?
> Please contact us directly.
I will discuss it with my ppl ...
btw: what's the state of Netware implementation? Had you any requests for
Netware Rebol implementation? I think there is still huge installed base of
Novell Netware fileservers ... just curious, nothing more ...
> > btw2: :-) re font engine - does Win version of Command contain the same
> > limitation - no VID, no text? If so - why should Win Command users
> > from some Unix architecture "nonsense"? ;-)
> At the moment this applies to all Command versions.
Hmm, something else came to my mind. We all saw how usefull VID is e.g. to
create diagrams. Now, without VID being incorporated into Command, we have
only image datatype, face support, but there is no easy way of how to create
those diagrams ... I think that sooner or later RT should think about at
least incorporating some font types into Command and allow us to use also