[REBOL] Re: Forum Name
From: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 7-Jan-2004 1:39
Am Dienstag 06 Januar 2004 22:08 schrieb Jason Cunliffe:
> > > Yeah I agree. I wouldn't want to fracture the community much more at
> > > point. I do think Altme serves a great purpose.
> > Problem with AltMe is it nature - it is great when comes to (rather
> > small IMO) group cooperation in making something - but fails, when
> > someone new comes in.
> > No archive - and even archive is provided, it will be one-long page to
> > dig-in.
Archive is there. Its not digital, its human. Just ask the question, and tips
and links pop up. Only google can compete :)
> I agree. AltME is good for live relatively intimate discussions, when one
> is keeping up daily, and swimming energetically in the stream. But its
> structure, archive interface, import/export, formatting, linking and any
> modern re-usable google access leave much to be desired.
> If it were openSource then it would be much easier for REbolers to
> contribute to its developement. Kind of ironic since AltME is 'free', and
> that precisely this sort of fast extensibility is one of the jopbs Rebol is
> supposed to be good at.
OTOH, More developers, more buttons in the GUI.
Btw, it is easy to contribute. The sending part is closed, but the data is
easily loadable in rebol. And to process. One could even reserve groups to
post in a forum. About the format, well, ask in the rebol-world ;)
> - Jason