[REBOL] Antwort: Re: Object "Serialization" (script repost)
From: sharriff:aina:med-iq at: 23-Feb-2001 9:53
You could keep me posted on this issue Renaud..
Regards
Sharriff Aina
med.iq information & quality in healthcare AG
"Renaud"
<[rgombert--esse] An: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]>
ntiel.net> Kopie:
Gesendet von: Thema: [REBOL] Re: Object "Serialization" (script repost)
[rebol-bounce--r]
ebol.com
23.02.01 09:38
Bitte
antworten an
rebol-list
From: "GS Jones" <[gjones05--mail--orion--org]>
To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 1:49 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Object "Serialization" (script repost)
> ....... I guess that at least on Windows, numerous
> objects would be best saved in a single, easily parsable file inorder to
> avoid the unused sector space .......
You're right Scott, the compression mode is only suitable for pretty big
objects, or collection of smaller ones ;-) I think the main interest is not
only to (eventualy) save disk space, but also to save things in a non
human-readable way.
Script as published allow now saving of multiple "object" in one single
file... but i still continue to improve it. The last one (not posted)
return
true if word/values file have been successfuly created and false otherwise,
and when you get-bin it return the list of loaded and created word/value
pairs (false otherwise).
I don't want to spamm the list with new versions of this script anymore,
but
i'll send new versions of the script to anybody asking me.
Renaud
ICQ#2602184
