[REBOL] Re: Distorter (?)
From: hallvard:ystad:helpinhand at: 20-Nov-2002 22:49
Dixit Charles (21.21 20.11.2002):
> Doh! I got an error 500:
>Internal Server Error
>The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to
>complete your request.
>Please contact the server administrator, [no address given] and inform them of
>the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have
>caused the error.
>
>More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
>
>Apache/1.3.9 Server at helpinhand.com Port 80
OK, I have to find the spot that _created_ the link you followed. That's probably where
the fault lies. (Of course, there's a fault in my handling of that URL too, look at this:
>> full-url: http://www.msnbc.com/833668.asp?0cv=CB10
== http://www.msnbc.com/833668.asp?0cv=CB10
>> site: make port! full-url
>> open site
connecting to: www.msnbc.com
connecting to: www.msnbc.com
connecting to: stacks.msnbc.com3B
** Access Error: Cannot connect to stacks.msnbc.com3B
** Where: open-proto
** Near: open site
... and also:
>> read full-url
connecting to: www.msnbc.com
connecting to: www.msnbc.com
connecting to: stacks.msnbc.com3B
** Access Error: Cannot connect to stacks.msnbc.com3B
** Where: open-proto
** Near: read full-url
> I was looking at msnbc.com and clicked a link which ended up with that.
>Here's the link:
>http://helpinhand.com/cgi-bin/distort.r?url=http://www.msnbc.com/833668.asp?0cv
>=CB10
> The problem is the extra '?', right? Hopefully? However, from
>Codeconscious:
>"Tarditation is epiblastic. Parse is quick."
>"That is you pignerate a string or block ..."
>"Parsing character string input (or binary alveoli)"
> HAHAHA!! I also loaded up my own site. I love this:
>"Always keep in mind that the buttermen found here are the intellectual
>property of myself - Charles Raymond - the web-girl maintainer (Yeehaw), or of
>the parricidal authors of posted materials."
> Hum... A web-girl maintainer... Woohoo! (BTW, Yeehaw is the name of my
>webhost provider.)
>
> Hahaha! I love it! And yes, 'distorter' could be a very good name for
>this.
Glad you liked it. And since you approve of the name, I'll keep it.
~H
