Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[ALLY] Launch security? Re:(4)

From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 16-Sep-2000 18:41

----- Original Message ----- From: <[jeff--rebol--com]> To: <[ally--rebol--com]> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 5:23 PM Subject: [ALLY] Launch security? Re:(3)
> > >>> Frank ([fsievert--uos--de]) wrote: > >>> I think that launch is > >>> not a really good idea. What happens, when I say > >>> launch {-s --do "do"}
> Launch is being changed to improve its security in two > important ways: > > 1. Launch only works from the test panel -- so launched > scripts can not launch others.
Uh! What a limitation, just checked out. Are we forced to write usefull scripts using panel???
> 2. Launched scripts *should* always start with default > security running, regardless of other monkey business > that people do with the launch string. > > That's the basic idea. We really want to be able to use > launch so if you see cases where the above is not the case > or you think you see other risks involved with launch please > let us know! > > The current behavior of launch isn't likely the final > behavior, but we need something like launch in the meantime > until we add mult-tasking. So let's patch the holes and > make it useful.
1) Haha :-))) So, all hackers, save current /View versions for later usage, till "dangerous" behavior is not removed :-) 2) Tasking? 8-) /me always wonder what are RT folks cooking behind the door .... -pekr-