[REBOL] Re: radical pov ... Re: Re: rebol/base
From: gerardcote:sympatico:ca at: 30-Sep-2002 15:00
Sorry to be late receiving these 2 last entries :
but I agree entirely with both of you.
P.S. I am now more "at ease" with the naming conventions of REBOL products line but really
could have been simpler from the start - even if it is FUN to get it so
(but this is unduly difficult to memorize for the rest of us ...).
> Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> > Yes, it is - but enough is enough imo. Just ask someone from
> > external world, what do they know about Rebol? If they even
> > recognise it, they are already confused by all the following:
> > ... My suggestion is - change Rebol architecture for good, do
> > it clever way, allow options and reduce product line - remove
> > /Pro and /Command versions - add real components...
> > Sorry for bringing in different pov, maybe a radical one, but
> > that's just me (and those agreeing with me, staying silent ;-)
And Joel replies as :