[REBOL] Re: Rugby revival
From: maarten:vrijheid at: 14-Aug-2003 21:57
> >Some questions:
> >- How should the functions be named? You'll have rexec, sexec, serve
and
> >get-rugby-service. Should they be changed?
> >
> I don't know if it is important for ppl have it modularised, so there
> would be e.g. Rugby lite version and Rugby full version, which would
> have security. But - if the size is not a big deal, I would vote for
> single func, using refinements ....
The security framework is built on top of the rexec layer so that's
impossible.
> 50 - 100 per seat? per project? or buy-once, use everwhere?
Buy once, use everywhere.
> >
> so, in the end ... what is the real difference in old Rugby, and Rugby
+
> Storm? Or let's better ask - is Storm usable for fine app development
> without Rugby? I still can't get the picture ... maybe you could
mention
> what kind of apps it would allow us to build?
>
Storm is a messaging engine. This has its merits, but Rugby may be more
convenient for some as it is more "traditional" RPC. If you know how to
code both will do the job, but Rugby is probably easier to use for most
people.
--Maarten
