[REBOL] Re: http scheme to support cookies
From: Izkata:Comcast at: 19-Apr-2005 18:13
>> Forgive my possible misconception, but doesn't the 2002, being
>> in the past, mean it's no longer valid?
> No. Copyright law varies across the world, so how long a copyright remains
> force varies.
> But if the principle you suggest were true, I'd be republishing all Harry
> Potter novels today; the most recent one has a copyright date of 2003.
Ah. Not quite what I meant, but nice suggestion (^.-)
I meant when there's a range like that. For example, WinXP says something
(c)1985-2002 (I forget the exact year) And, apparently, people (Mostly
hackers) have been releasing dummed-down versions of Windows on the
all the capabilities, nearly no extra features, so it runs much faster and
> But let's hope that RT will forget copyright and just do what's right.
Who isn't? =^þ