[REBOL] Re: serious proposition...WAS: RE: Standards
From: atruter:labyrinth:au at: 7-Nov-2003 10:54
If this tool / methodology / mechanism can deliver the equivilant of a
CPAN to the REBOL world then I think that would be a good thing indeed.
There are already a number of standards that folks adhere to, including:
- word naming conventions
- REBOL header usage
- code indentation
I see this as a logical (and unifying) progression, with the priviso that
it probably won't get off the ground unless RT give it their blessing. To
really encourage fence-sitters like me, how about working with RT to get a
REBOL/Library (for example) document added to their site's documentation
section. Once it's set in concrete like this it's a lot harder to ignore!