Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: "piping" functions

From: volker:nitsch:g:mail at: 23-Nov-2005 0:50

On 11/23/05, Jean-Francois Allie <jf_allie-hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I wrote these two functions BUTFIRST and BUTLAST (as in > LOGO) butlast: func [series] [ > copy/part num (length? num) - 1] butfirst: func [series] [ > copy/part next num (length? num) - 1] It seemed to work: >>num: [1 2 3 > 4] > == [1 2 3 4] > >>butfirst num > == [2 3 4] > >>butlast num > == [1 2 3] ... but unfortunately, when I try to compose functions with > them as in: > >>butfirst butlast num > == [2 3 4] > >>butlast butfirst num > == [1 2 3] I'm very curious to understand why. many thanks jf
Good question, confused me too. Until i discovered you wrote: butlast: func [series] [copy/part num (length? num) - 1] In rebol 'series is the arguement, 'num is the global.
> -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. >
-- -Volker Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of indirection. But that usually will create another problem. David Wheeler