Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: read-thru check refinement

From: arolls:bigpond:au at: 22-Jul-2001 19:51

Refer to the source to exists-thru?, which is used by read-thru.
> Still, it doesn't explain why we have to supply the date and time > since they must be with the already downloaded file, right?
Not necessarily. You could be supplying a minimum date for many files, for instance.
> what's the point of supplying a logic or none?
Well, if the 'info argument supplied to exists-thru? is a logic! (not a block!), then true is always returned. This means that read-thru tries to update the file from the net. So I don't really see the point either. There could be a function out there that sometimes supplies exists-thru? with a logic! Which gives me an idea.
> > The block is the standard info block for a file item in an index > > file: > > > [971 23-Sep-2000/16:51:34-7:00] > > > It contains the size in bytes and the time-stamp. Read-thru/check > > will not download a file if it is already in the cache and the date > > and time-stamp match those on the remote file.
Actually, exists-thru? returns true if the net-file is newer than the cache-file by 3 seconds or more.