[REBOL] Re: [new-line new-lines] NEW-LINES dialect wrapper for NEW-LINE func
From: anton:wilddsl:au at: 18-May-2007 16:01
Hi Gregg,
Well, I suggested a dialect when NEW-LINES was being
designed, but they were in too much of a hurry.
Your dialect seems easy to read but I think it could
be more concise. It doesn't really need 'marker(s), 'in or
'item(s).
I would also probably move the block to be modified outside
the dialect block, as the second argument, to facilitate
directly specified (anonymous) blocks. (Yes, I need to do
that sometimes.) Otherwise, I'm back to the situation I
was in before, with some of the NEW-LINES specification
trailing the block to be modified.
("eigth" is also missing an 'h')
I certainly appreciate your effort in this direction.
Regards,
Anton.
