[REBOL] Re: Can I define an anti function?

From: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 24-Feb-2004 2:32

Romano Paolo Tenca napsal(a):

>My first attempt, but i do not know if it is a right answer:
>
>    antif: func [:f [any-function!] args[block!]][do head insert copy args :f]
>
>---
>Ciao
>Romano
>
It isn't, because it takes 2 arguments, while ANTI has to take just one: F

-L

1 · 2 · 3 · [4] · 5 · 6 ... 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · See whole thread