[REBOL] Re: The complete Rebol named argument passing
From: rotenca:telvia:it at: 27-Feb-2004 0:19
> Do you think you would use APPLY that way? I wouldn't. I would use
> it this way, instead:
> apply :find [
> series value part range only case any
> with wild skip size match tail last reverse
This is the only case in which you syntax has some advantage.
But i think that it is not enough to change an aspect of rebol language: order
of refinements must remain not important under any respect.
I think that another solution, if any, must be found.