Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] [integration] [core] A big vote for REBOL/Core (was Re: Questions about the 'send' function)

From: luke:marmaladefoo at: 9-Aug-2004 12:05

Dear all Are these kernel functions (call, send/attach etc) that are more advanced in View going to be put back into Core? Or is Core going to be "retired" (that would be such a real shame). If the functions are going back in, when can we expect to see an updated Core executable? As I see it, from an interoperability perspective, there is little point in having the two running on two different versions of the basic kernel functions. From my point of view, REBOL is great back-end/server functionality - so I'm a big fan of REBOL/Core - but the GUI side in View is still a long way from providing sufficiently powerful, easy-to-integrate basic functionality that is expected in usable GUI apps that can be easily adopted by ordinary users (treeview, menus, listview, quality HTML display etc). Good luck to the REBOL/View project, but I'm sticking to Core. Please lets keep them in step! Regards - Luke On 7 Aug 2004, at 19:02, PSA102 wrote: From: "PSA102" <[psa102--toward--com]> To: "[rebolist--rebol--com]" <[rebolist--rebol--com]> Date sent: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 19:02:32 -0400 Priority: Normal Subject: [REBOL] Re: Questions about the 'send' function Send reply to: [rebolist--rebol--com]
> Maxim, > > My goodness. What is v 1.2.10? I have REBOL/Core OK, I'll bet I've just learned that
what I
> shoudl be using is Rebol/View becuase it has a later version of the Rebol "kernal" functions than > Rebol/CORE. > > What version do I need to order to get the /attach refinement to the send command? > > Thanks. > > John Wirt > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request > at with unsubscribe as the subject. >
__________________________________________ Various gadgets widgets, links and chat