Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: Overhead for insert and blocks

From: joel:neely:fedex at: 30-Oct-2000 10:14

Hi, Chris, [cpage--starforge--demon--co--uk] wrote:
...
> I chose this structure to make accessing, adding and > removing records easier for me. The only problem I have > is that I can't use append - new items must be inserted > at the start of the list for reasons that would take too > long to go into now. >
In that case (without going into "too long" issues), how about trying either list! storage or (it you can separate the "build" from "use" phases of the blocks)... typical-block: make block! big-enough-number ... insert/only tail typical-block new-sub-block ... Then, after the blocks are built... typical-block: reverse typical-block ... ...use typical-block, which is now in chronological order... -jn- -- ; Joel Neely [joel--neely--fedex--com] 901-263-4460 38017/HKA/9677 REBOL [] do [ do func [s] [ foreach [a b] s [prin b] ] sort/skip do function [s] [t] [ t: "" foreach [a b] s [repend t [b a]] t ] { | e s m!zauafBpcvekexEohthjJakwLrngohOqrlryRnsctdtiub} 2 ]