[REBOL] Re: parse, again...
From: nitsch-lists:netcologne at: 4-Nov-2001 1:13
RE: [REBOL] Re: parse, again...
> > > Thanks Volker and Ladislav too. Volker: I can't seem to get your rule
> > > Ladislav's to behave differently. They both react only if there is at
> > > one character in the sitrng.
> There may be a speed difference, you can do some benchmarking to find out.
> > i think having [thru end] to say "i got all, stop!" would be a feature.
> Actually, in http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/parseen.r I use [to end skip]. [thru
> end] seems to be shorter while having the same meaning.
>> parse "hello" [to end skip]
>> parse "hello" [skip to end]
[to end skip] will stop, but gives false.
our "workarounds" gives true but are not so obvious.
i would like to get "stop" and "true", and somehow,
[thru end] would make sense to me (its what one thinks of first?)