Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Private Object Function

From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 16-Jan-2001 19:36

Hello Elan! On 15-Gen-01, you wrote: E> how is this any ifferent from what you can do with the current E> stable version (2.3)? That makes 2.3 (and all the versions before latest experimental) crash after a recycle. E> The questions, however, remain. a) The protection can be E> circumvented, in as much as I can use get-value's body to E> access add-one as well as value. b) The object o cannot be E> serialized together with the hidden words. This is true. But it is not a problem usually. You're not trying to protect secret code, you're just trying to avoid accidental use of a word meant to be private; this is useful for team projects, or to separate interface from implementation. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[giesse--writeme--com]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --