[REBOL] Re: parse, again...
From: lmecir:mbox:vol:cz at: 4-Nov-2001 15:48
Hi Volker,> > Actually, in http://www.sweb.cz/LMecir/parseen.r I use [to end skip].[thru> > end] seems to be shorter while having the same meaning.It seems that instead of [to end skip] I am using I can use [end skip] or [thru end], that is all I wanted to say. Your suggestion is not compatible with the current behaviour of PARSE. I am not sure your suggestion is compatible with the PARSE philosophy.