Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Make_user_manual.r ?

From: m:koopmans2:chello:nl at: 22-Jan-2002 14:10

> > Suppose I redid those 6000 words of text in (say) make-doc format. And > > embedded in them was a "click-stream" to run the application, add data, > > scroll, etc; and then capture the screen image and insert it in the > printed > > document. > > What a wonderful idea! I'd say everyone that uses Rebol/View would love
> It seems to be to be very closely related to those training wizards that > demonstrate the actions and the results. It is probably also closely
> of those recruitment tests that meaure a user's performance in completing
> task in an application.
I agree. And would bow deeply ;-) <....>
> Another alternative, ratbag idea, is to write a brute of a program that
> take a layout and replace every action function it can find in the layout > (all the way down) with a new function that (a) fires some recording event > and (b) calls the original action. The problem with this is what scheme
> be used to identify the action recorded so it can be saved and loaded
> Your name idea might be useful here. I wonder if there are others - path
> face?
Isn't it better to change the behaviour of View there? Make an action2 field that contains the action field, and set the action field to [record action2], where record records and does action2. Or is this what you mean? My 0.02 eurocents ;-)