[REBOL] Re: Make_user_manual.r ?
From: m:koopmans2:chello:nl at: 22-Jan-2002 14:10
> > Suppose I redid those 6000 words of text in (say) make-doc format. And
> > embedded in them was a "click-stream" to run the application, add data,
> > scroll, etc; and then capture the screen image and insert it in the
> > document.
> What a wonderful idea! I'd say everyone that uses Rebol/View would love
> It seems to be to be very closely related to those training wizards that
> demonstrate the actions and the results. It is probably also closely
> of those recruitment tests that meaure a user's performance in completing
> task in an application.
I agree. And would bow deeply ;-)
> Another alternative, ratbag idea, is to write a brute of a program that
> take a layout and replace every action function it can find in the layout
> (all the way down) with a new function that (a) fires some recording event
> and (b) calls the original action. The problem with this is what scheme
> be used to identify the action recorded so it can be saved and loaded
> Your name idea might be useful here. I wonder if there are others - path
Isn't it better to change the behaviour of View there?
Make an action2 field that contains the action field, and set the action
field to [record action2],
where record records and does action2. Or is this what you mean?
My 0.02 eurocents ;-)