Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] to encrypt, or not to encrypt... Re:

From: ryanc:iesco-dms at: 5-Sep-2000 11:31

With REBOL you wont be too successful hiding this from a REBOL programmer, because of course a properly placed probe would easily reveal it no matter how much encryption you threw at it. So basically all you can do is keep it from being non-programmer readable in a file. The easiest way to this is with to-binary:
>> password: "password"
== "password"
>> to-binary password
== #{70617373776F7264} This is a little too obvious to me though, maybe compress:
>> compress password
== #{789C2B482C2E2ECF2F4A01000F91037408000000} Or lastly if your space conscious:
>> forall password [change password to-char xor 85 first password]
== false
>> head password
== {%4&&":'1} --Ryan [balayo--mindspring--com] wrote:
> howdy list, > > There have been several posts on encryption lately. I'd > like to be able to encrypt a local password file to call on > when constructing ftp urls. I don't want to hard-code them > into scripts, and I'm already tired of > > ;pass: ask/hide "password? " > > I also don't like to have my passwords floating around my drive > in plain text. > > How do you guys handle this? > > thanks > -- > > Eat more spinach. > -tom
-- * Ryan Cole * Programmer Analyst 707-468-5400 ;Fortuneately escape will cancel this endless loop... Forever [ buy microsoft version: version + 1 ]