[REBOL] Re: ROUND function (like TRUNC, FLOOR, etc...)
From: joel:neely:fedex at: 20-Feb-2002 13:59
Ladislav Mecir wrote:
> ...an object has a context, ...
> I think, that we can safely say: an object *is* a context.
> (which is the POV presented by RT too)
Functions have context. Does that mean that functions have objects?
I wouldn't even have a problem with the statement "An object *is*
A KIND OF context", but the discussion of BIND doesn't leave one (me
at least) with the impression that it is limited to objects (even if
the underlying implementation of objects and function contexts is
> > Communicate not so that you CAN be understood, but so
> > that you MUST be understood.
> Am I approaching that state in this case?
Clear as ever!