[REBOL] Re: Perl is to stupid to understand this 1 liner.
From: carl:cybercraft at: 18-Dec-2001 19:46
On 18-Dec-01, Joel Neely wrote:
> Whether a human manufactures the rules, or a piece of AI software
> attempts to do so (and I suspect the human will do a better job at
> this point in history), the problem remains that the size of the
> rule set itself undergoes a combinatorial explosion as we try to
> take into account the variations in the data.
Perhaps, instead of trying to make software understand documents
written any old which way by humans, we should create strictly formal
versions of current human languages that can be tested for
correctness by computer? We'd then be able to have documents that
could be examined by computer without the need to worry about an
infinate number of special cases.