[REBOL] Re: Bug of TRY was bug of function error?
From: rotenca:telvia:it at: 23-Jul-2002 18:43
> My philosophy is different: because the value can be obtained legally (it is
> almost impossible to detect it when it occurs), I would rather treat is as a
> legal value, e.g. as an empty series. A curiosity:
>
The solution, for me, is to transform every "Out of range" reference to a
series, when evaluated, in a tail reference.
> append b "a"
tail b works, so works append which uses tail
To catch a little more errors, tail and head should trigger an error.
Try this:
clear head b: next "a" ;== ""
join "a" b ; ->>>>>> CRASH "expand series overflow"
---
Ciao
Romano
