[REBOL] Re: parse question
From: agem:crosswinds at: 27-Jun-2001 14:37
RE: [REBOL] Re: parse question
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:42:47 -0500
> Joel Neely <[joel--neely--fedex--com]> wrote:
> > I must agree with Graham on this one. A zero-length
> > string
> > is a completely legitimate value, but most definitely is
> > *not*
> > the same thing as NONE!
> Trouble is I guess we are stuck with this behaviour as
> changing it might cause problems with legacy code :-(
could be some option like parse/empties ?