Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: The complete Rebol named argument passing

From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 27-Feb-2004 12:28

Hi Romano, On Friday, February 27, 2004, 11:46:59 AM, you wrote: RPT> Instead, if i have a function like this: RPT> my-func: [a b /skip value /reverse] RPT> and i want to pass /reverse to find, I must construct exactly that kind of RPT> block full of false which seems so strange to you and that you say you will RPT> never use. Hmm, but if you have to construct the block, then why not constructing a path like Ladislav does in his functions. I don't see any advantage. RPT> If i rewrite a function i must respect the refinements order to make old RPT> program not fail. Probably it's much better to use named arguments then. Otherwise Carl has to add binding to refinements too. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --- SOON: