[REBOL] Re: The complete Rebol named argument passing
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 27-Feb-2004 12:28
Hi Romano,
On Friday, February 27, 2004, 11:46:59 AM, you wrote:
RPT> Instead, if i have a function like this:
RPT> my-func: [a b /skip value /reverse]
RPT> and i want to pass /reverse to find, I must construct exactly that kind of
RPT> block full of false which seems so strange to you and that you say you will
RPT> never use.
Hmm, but if you have to construct the block, then why not
constructing a path like Ladislav does in his functions. I don't
see any advantage.
RPT> If i rewrite a function i must respect the refinements order to make old
RPT> program not fail.
Probably it's much better to use named arguments then. Otherwise
Carl has to add binding to refinements too.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila --- SOON: http://www.rebol.it/
