[REBOL] Re: rebol/base
From: petr::krenzelok::trz::cz at: 30-Sep-2002 16:05
[mh983--attbi--com] wrote:
>Does anyone else think the naming of base and core are reversed? Seems
>that core would be the smallest, 'core' piece of rebol, and base would
>add features on top of the core.
>
>I don't know what that means for
>the /view question. Maybe /viewcore and /view? or /view and /view+
>Just please not view++ :-)
>
>mike
>
I don't want to participate in name election, as it is imo pretty
irrelevant right now. I think that the most important factor is to get
things done in the right way :-)
Anyway - why to confuse outside world with other names? If we want to
introduce all - core, view, command, link in their base versions, just
let's combine refinements ;-)
rebol/core/light
rebol/view/light
rebol/command/light
or
rebol/core/base
rebol/view/base
rebol/command/base
KISS :-)
-pekr-
