Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: rebol/base

From: petr::krenzelok::trz::cz at: 30-Sep-2002 16:05

[mh983--attbi--com] wrote:
>Does anyone else think the naming of base and core are reversed? Seems >that core would be the smallest, 'core' piece of rebol, and base would >add features on top of the core. > >I don't know what that means for >the /view question. Maybe /viewcore and /view? or /view and /view+ >Just please not view++ :-) > >mike >
I don't want to participate in name election, as it is imo pretty irrelevant right now. I think that the most important factor is to get things done in the right way :-) Anyway - why to confuse outside world with other names? If we want to introduce all - core, view, command, link in their base versions, just let's combine refinements ;-) rebol/core/light rebol/view/light rebol/command/light or rebol/core/base rebol/view/base rebol/command/base KISS :-) -pekr-