[REBOL] Re: Why does 'reverse returns the tail of the block?
From: brett:codeconscious at: 13-Nov-2002 0:07
> However, maybe it is more common to have it chained with other > functions, where returning the series at the same position as the > argument would be more useful. What do you think?If someone wants to chain it why not define a chainable reverse?>> reverse0: func [value][reverse value value] >> reverse0 s: [ 1 2 3 4]== [4 3 2 1] Regards, Brett.